Lyons' fantastic Can-Am Cars in Detail:
to see the latest news
All news content copyright Michael J. Fuller, unless
>>Pete Lyons leaves us with a final post script of the 1991 Toyota Eagle MkIII test photo by sending along a shot he took in 1993
of the Toyota Eagle MkIII in its final form. That year Road
Atlanta was being paved and the IMSA GTP round occurred at the Atlanta
|The second photo he sent was of the real Stardust International Raceway, this taken at the 1967 Can-Am event.|
Many thanks Mr. Lyons!
>>LeMans.org is reporting
that the Toyota LMP1 will debut to the press in late January 2012.
Anyone live near Paul Ricard and have a camera...?
|>>We've been handed a copy of the latest draft (final?) of the 2012 regulations. Ho, ho, ho.|
>>We're hearing the expected "delivery" date for the ACO2014 rules has now moved to March 2012.
ago we posted this image sent to us by Mike Cook. We stated it
was taken at Stardust International Raceway and went about our
Well it was brought to our attention yesterday, by none other
than Pete Lyons, that Stardust closed in...1970. So the question
went out to the AAR folks. And after exchanging emails between
Brian Willis, Mike Cook, Pete Lyons, John Ward, and Kathy Weida we
finally have an answer of where the test actually occurred.
clues were that the test was definitely in Las Vegas and that the track
was near Nellis Air Force Base . Well digging up Google maps
looking at Nellis shows none other than what is now called Las Vegas
Motor Speedway. Back then it was simply Las Vegas Raceway, and
recalls Mike Cook, "Gotta say, there wasn't much to the track. It
was like it was totally deserted and disused, tumbleweed and scrub
brush obscuring every apex and corner exit. No pits, timing or
race control towers, nothing. Desolate." These were the
days before the big oval was built.
But Willis recalls a slight stumble before the car was readied:
issue was that John Ward had me do the gear shift linkage. He
gave me the shift pattern for the box, so I drew up the linkage and
Phil Remington made it. Phil came to me and said, 'We have a
small problem-the gearshift is backwards!' I panicked and looked
at the setup and it was
backwards! I checked the drawings, data, and everything was OK.
This was a Sunday and John Ward came in Monday and so I had to
explain my mistake. He came in, I explained it all, and he said,
'Well fix it,' and left. Ten minutes later he came over all
sheepish and said he had transposed the shift fork motion on the sketch
he gave me and so it was all his fault. There was no time to fix
it before the test so the car ran with the shifter backwards!"
|>>Oak Racing revealed their 2012 LMP2 challenger today.|
The Oak's front fender, with its vertical leading edge (A), takes cues from the HPD ARX-01e/ARX-03a/b and the Audi R18. Outboard splitter detail (B) is also similar to the ARX (1, 2)
series of LMPs. We see a lot of development in the trailing edge
area of the pontoon fenders (C). The valance panel (D) performs a
rules compliance funtion and the side pods are more heavily waisted (E)
than previous. The sidepod is also much more sculputed ahead of
the rear fender (F). The car was shown with the mandatory Big Honking Holes (G) and Big Honking Fin (H).
understand aerodynamics development was carried out via scale model
tunnel, at the RUAG tunnel in Switzerland. Interestingly, Oak's
Christophe Chapelain admits the 2012 car essentially isn't any better
aerodynamically than the 2011 car, "The gains compared last year is nothing because we have lost too much with the openings."
|Conquest Racing also announced today that they will run the Oak LMP2 chassis in the 2012 American Le Mans Series.|
close up of the R18's tub, where it interfaces with the engine cover,
better shows the lack of refueling recepticle and the removal of the
very small horizontal perimeter "shelf". This small detail is
easily ignored and only makes itself known by the highlight it creates (see next image below).
Sebring, January 2011, the debut R18. Many changes were made to
the car throughout the year, so ignore the slanting Big Honking Fin,
the differences around the wheel well exit, etc. These were
updated during the season to the spec the R18H is currently testing in.
We only want to look at the exposed tub surfaces and compare
these to the above. Note the differences.|
we're adamant the tub is new, but it could simply be a modification to
the upper mold half and front suspension pickup points thus making it only "60%" new mold surfaces. We're only pointing this out just in case the Audi folk get pedantic.
|Here's a better shot of the engine cover bulge we pointed out yesterday. As we can see, it is assymetric to car centerline.|
The exhaust pipe is now round in section.
|>>Quattroworld has released a gallery of shots taken at Sebring of
the Audi R18H. Upon analysis of their side by side we're more
convinced now that the R18H has a new monocoque. The primary drivers
are the lack of fuel receptacle on the car's left hand side (this is an
engineered-in hard point and not easily removed), and more importantly,
the vastly reduced highlight/edge that skirts the side of the tub.
Structural edges and faces can't be easily softened without evidence
(covering panels for instance). |
We also noticed the crash structure/nose is longer and the leading edge split line for the engine cover is further forward.
difficult to analyse the rest of the car's aero as it mostly appears
cribbed off the old car and most certainly isn't the definitive form.
if there are still any lingering doubts that this is the
Hybrid...apparently corner workers at the Sebring test have been warned
to stay clear of the car in case of an accident as the car is, "...full
of electrical energy.
>>Today Audi released
three images of their R18H. The accompanying press release
discusses a currently on-going test at Sebring though they've released
images from a previous test at Paul Ricard. Also of note, as
drawn down from Audi Kommunication's press site, the images are very
low resolution (around 100 kb @ 72 dpi), not their typical print-ready
300 dpi and 2-3 mb. Significant or jumping to conclusions?
couple of things we notice. First thing, the front glass has
been revised as the shape is much fuller. This is noticeable in
the front and side views. This is clearly to address the
outward/forward visibility issues the R18 suffered through this season.
But perhaps more importantly,
the front suspension also has been revised. We know this as the
as the bulge from the pushrod is gone. This suggests a rather
substantial redesign, making one wondering how deep that revision has
gone because altering torsion bar locations would require modifications
to the design of the monocoque. And of course there already is
that rumor out there; that Audi has done just that and designed and
manufactured a new tub for 2012. Could this be it?
a betting man might say the revisions to the front suspension had
something to do with the hybrid system that is set to be introduced
next season. But, Audi has been pretty clear that the original
car was designed to accept hybridization from the start. So why
would they make large revisions going into year two to do as they say
the car was already designed to do? Perhaps money does grow on
trees at Audi? Or we're slightly off mark and something else is
going on. There's rumors that the suspension revisions might be
aimed at improving mechanical grip. So some of these revisions
aren't evidence of hybidization necessarily as that's a foregone
The nose crash structure also has a much sharper
radii all around, gone is the platypus look. The connecting
panels between the nose and the font fenders have also been revised,
though this area was scene of active development throughout the
front fenders appear to have yet another different shape. We saw
at least 2 different fenders this past season, arguably 3. The
fenders here appear to be similar to the fenders the car originally
rolled out with, not the smoother Le Mans style.|
|Perhaps just perception, but the turbo inlet appears squarer with slightly more inlet area.|
The car does not appear to be in 2012 aero spec, note the apparent lack of Big Honking Holes.
in the day it was confirmed that the car in the images is indeed the
Hybrid R18. Where did the confirmation come from? None
other than the extended "properties" data embedded within every digital
image. It also tells us these images were taken last month,
November 17th to be exact.
|Antonio Pannullo sends us this comparison which demonstrates the problem with working with low resolution images.
Antonio rightfully points out differences in the new car.
But with low res images we're really left in the dark. It
does appear there is an exit duct of some sort ahead of the "P1"
sticker. And there also does appear to be a bulge in the engine
cover (yellow arrow at leading edge of rear fender). And with a
higher resolution image we'd be able to zoom in there and have a better
look. Audi of course knows this and hence our hands are tied.|
additional image has arrived that shows the fender holes slightly
better. They are horribly crude looking and you really have to
think the best minds in motorsports can come up with something better.
Hopefully the 2014 rules will do away with the band-aid aero
fixes the ACO rules have been adopting since 2004.
>>Images have arrived showing Oak testing in preliminary 2012 fender hole specification.
|Note the break in the front fender louvers.|
|Also, it is evident that the top of the rear fender has been removed.|
Corner's minions were stalking the Oak Racing/Dunlop test at Sebring
earlier in the week. We understand a full contingent from Oak was
in attendance: two cars, multiple mechanics, drivers, and tire support.
What were they up to? Initially we thought it it was a
shake down and hand over test for an ALMS team.
Speed's John Dagys says it's simply a Dunlop test and we now have
confirmation that's the case: Dyson and a couple of GT teams are also
car in these images is a box-standard 2011. Note the lack of 2012
front/rear fender holes. We're told Oak ran the 2012 holes today.|
added a new product to the Mulsanne's Corner's Cafe Press store.
Based off a SolidWorks drawing inspired by a correction to a Tony Mathews sketch. Embrace your inner geekdom.
hasn't been much out of the Delta Wing camp officially lately, but off the record we're told that
work continues rather diligently. The Aston Martin tub is now in
the shop (the one from the image
a few months back was a mock up) and assemblies now have something to
hang off of. The front composite crash structure is making
progress and will be done in house at AAR. The uprights are being
fabbed up and Metalore is working on the hubs. And finally, I'm
told an engine has been selected though we'll have to wait on the
>>Former TRD employee Mike Cook shares this image taken in 1991 of the first test of the Toyota Eagle MkIII at Stardust International Raceway (layout) Las Vegas Raceway. Says Mike, "It was a very exciting day and we all knew we had something special. You can tell from Dan's huge grin!"
can see, from left to right, Dan Gurney, Hiro Fujimori, Jim Hamilton,
and Rocky Moran (who did all the driving that day). Some might
also recognize ex-Panoz man Brian Willis, 6th from the left.
Starting on the far right, 4th in, is John Ward with Phil
Remington next to him. Mike Cook is 7th in from the right in the
white t-shirt and sun glasses.
>>More details are beginning to emerge regarding the 2012 regulation changes as well as the 2014 rules.
For 2012, the Big Honking Holes, as of November 3 (modified Technical Bulletin #11-22), are defined as:
At the front they will have a minimum area of 750 cm^2 and a maximum area of 950 cm^2
At the rear they will have a minimum area of 1000 cm^2 and a maximum are of 1200 cm^2
A minimum of 30 mm offset must be maintained between the outer edge of the opening and the outer edge of the fender
As seen from the front or rear, it is permissible to see the tops of the tire
A 20 cm x 25 cm template must be able to pass through the openings front and rear
The rear wing gurneys (20 mm) are no longer mandatory for LMP1 and LMP2
understand some of the dimensional details of the fin have been
slightly redefined though it is the same for all intents and purposes.
2014, we're hearing that overall dimensions more than likely will be
changing. The current proposal is a 1900 mm maximum width and a
4500 mm maximum length (the current regulation is 2000 mm and 4650 mm
respectively). The cockpit width isn't expected to change though
the cockpit height dimension could increase slightly. There
aren't expected to be any changes to the front and rear overhang
The reasoning behind the width and length
dimensional changes are for increased aero efficiency, this to go hand
in hand with the proposed emphasis on fuel efficiency, hybrids, and
decreased weight. The width reduction alone would be worth a ~5%
reduction in frontal area.
It would also appear that maximum tire widths will be reduced to 14" for 2014; the era of the wide fronts would thus be over.
I am not an engineer or a major technical type, I enjoy the discipline
of aerodynamics and was pleased at how Paul was able to explain its
to individuals like me." - Jay Leno, Tonight Show Host
and automotive enthusiast Paul T. Glessner presents "The Secrets
Basics of Vehicle Aerodynamics" Seminars. See why more cars
faster and doing it more safely and in style. Paul has been
to speak at venues like Bob Bondurant School of High Performance
Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), Specialty Equipment Marketing
(SEMA), and Performance Racing Industry (PRI). Paul's
educate and entertain. The day long seminar can be held at
organization and/or company location with the organizer paying only
(click event date in site) to read
extensive background and testimonials from enthusiasts like Jay
Schedule your seminar at www.aeroseminars.com!