Mulsanne's Corner NEWS isn't meant to be THE source for up to date news items. Instead what we are doing is providing an archive for information collected through out the Net related to new car developments. Occasionally we do post first hand gathered items, but most of the time it is news from secondary sources such as dailysportscar.com or Autosport. We will provide all sources for any news item shown here.
|
February
2005
Reload
to see the latest news
| 2.23.05
|
![]() |
Note
the small rear body gurney and the dive plane shape transitioning over
the mandatory rear aero structure. One could make the argument that
from this angle it appears the trailing edge of the under floor is flexing
with the outboard ends lifting upwards width-wise across the trailing edge. |
Compare
the front brake inlet NACA ducts on the Lola to the Dome LMP image below. |
| 2.14.05
|
From
the rendering we can garner a few more details. Of interest is the
Venetian Blinds treatment at the front wheel well exit. This is to
make the car compliant to Art 3.4.1 a/ which essentially says that any
bodywork as seen from the side can not be offset any more than 150 mm from
the outboard edge of the car. The solution, as executed here, is
to overlap bodywork as seen from the side thereby creating a shadow plate
at the 150 mm offset and then being free to do whatever you like behind.
Additionally note the engine intakes located in the passenger side head
rest. The ACO seemed to have acquiesced on this point as it wasn't
their original intention to allow for the passenger's head rest to serve
any function other than safety. |
It
is interesting that Dome felt compelled to release an underbody image.
But then since the regulations essentially prescribe a near spec underfloor;
seen one you've seen them all. Of course with whatever wiggle-room
there is in the regulations, Dome wouldn't be showing their cards here. |